Do Miracles Really Happen?
On the morning of January 19th, 2009, 150 passengers
boarded a routine flight from New York La Guardia airport headed to Charlotte,
NC. As the plane climbed from the runway
it collided with a flock of geese near the airport, critically damaging both of
the airplane’s engines. Captain Chesley “Sully”
Sullenberger applied over 19,000 hours experience to safely land the A320 aircraft
on the surface of the Hudson. The tenth anniversary
of what has now become known as “The Miracle on the Hudson” was just observed a
week ago, celebrating the heroism of the crew and the fact that all 155
passengers and crew survived what should have been a catastrophe. We call it a miracle because we all know that
outcomes, like the one above, are rare to say the least.
Typically, when any decision maker is faced with a number of
simultaneous system failures, it represents a crisis. The success of any business rises and falls
on the ability of leadership to manage crises.
These situations are rare, unexpected and, often we spend little time
preparing or practicing for them in advance.
Crises require human decision makers to think at a faster pace than
normal, typically with less feedback than they receive and are able to process
in a stable environment. Let’s just say,
crises, like the one above, are high-stress events that require focus and
recall at a pace that few human minds are capable of keeping.
While decades of experience, like that of Captain Sully, can
be of great benefit when called upon to provide direction at a pivotal moment, we
need to realize that people like Sullenberger, with just the right experience
to match the circumstances, are few and far between. In the absence of experience, we need
supporting intelligence. Like a medical doctor
uses test results to derive a diagnosis, or an auto mechanic requires computer
codes to understand what makes your car literally tick, experience and
intuition augmented with business intelligence and data analytics, help
business leaders make better, faster, more accurate decisions.
The point is, while we take great pride in our leadership
acumen, we are naïve if we believe our decision making cannot be enhanced with actionable
data. But, perhaps like any new skill,
we are reluctant to take the time and resources to develop a data-driven
decision culture. It requires new
technologies, new processes and literacy in a new language set. This can be difficult in an environment that
is already over-run with challenges. How
does one find the time to pause or stop to chase a new, elusive initiative? This could be a question that’s answer has
existential ramifications.
Consider the airline accident above. It is quite likely that Captain Sully had the
skills to manhandle that massive aircraft to a safe landing without the aid of
any data. But, its not likely. He needed to know his altitude, air speed, position,
etc. and use that information to determine the best course of action. Why didn’t the pilot attempt to fly to Teterboro
or return to La Guardia? These are the questions
that investigators asked. After over a
dozen tests and first-hand testimony, it was determined that Sullenberger made
the right decision to ditch, although the likelihood of survival would be
considered slim. He was not only supported
by real-time intelligence, in the end, he was vindicated by corroborating data
generated by the investigation.
Comments
Post a Comment